Change in Social Security COLAs
The COLA is currently based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners (CPI-W), which reflects everyday spending an individual would face, including expenses for food, housing, transportation, consumer goods, etc.
Under the new bill, however, the COLA would be based on the Consumer Price Index for Americans aged 62 or older (CPI-E), as this price index reflects the costs incurred by older adults more accurately. Medical expenses, an increasing burden on older adults, are weighted more heavily in the CPI-E than in the CPI-W.
Keeping up with rising healthcare costs
According to data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures for individuals age 65 and older rose 41% from 2009 to 2019, going from $4,846 to $6,833. Older individuals paid significantly more than the total population, which spent an average of $5,193 in out-of-pocket costs in 2019. Overall, older Americans spent 13.6% of their total expenditures on health, compared to just 8.2% among all consumers.
“The current COLA formula doesn’t accurately account for the inflation seniors face, especially in health care,” Roman Ulman, president of AFSCME Arizona Retirees Chapter 97, said in a statement. “It’s important that the COLA reflects how inflation impacts seniors so that we can pay our bills and our monthly Social Security checks stay strong.”
Along with directing the Social Security Administration (SSA) to adjust benefits based on CPI-E rather than CPI-W (if CPI-E would result in a larger increase in benefits), the Boosting Benefits and COLAs for Seniors Act would also direct the Bureau of Labor Statistics to calculate and publish the CPI-E every month.
According to Newsweek, the proposed legislation, if passed, “would apply to determinations made with respect to cost-of-living computation quarters ending on or after September 30, 2024.” However, some experts, including Richard Johnson, senior fellow and director of the program on retirement policy at the Urban Institute, don’t see the bill going far in Congress.
“This has been talked about for at least a decade,” Johnson tells MarketWatch. “If it were part of a broader package of Social Security reforms, maybe.” He claims these changes would cost more and add budgetary stress to the Social Security system.
